________________________________________________________________
Thursday, August 1, 2019
Financial
Capitalism Gone Amok: Ultra-low
Interest Rates and Price Bubbles
By Dr. Rodrigue Tremblay
(Author of the books “The
Code for Global Ethics”, and “The
New American Empire”)
“The first panacea for a mismanaged nation
is inflation of the currency; the second is war. Both bring a temporary
prosperity; both bring a permanent ruin. But both are the refuge of political
and economic opportunists."
Ernest Hemingway (1899-1961), (September 1932)
“Armies, and debts, and taxes
are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the
few.”
James Madison, (1751-1836), 4th U.S. President, (April 20, 1795)
“If the American people ever allow private banks to
control the issue of their money, first by inflation and then by deflation, the
banks and corporations that will grow up around them (around the banks),
will deprive the people of their property until their children will wake up
homeless on the continent their fathers conquered.”
Thomas
Jefferson, (1743-1826), 3rd U.S.
President
“We know now that government run by organized
money is the same as government run by the organized mob.”
Franklin D. Roosevelt (1882-1945), 32nd American President, 1933-1945, (in a speech at Madison Square Garden,
Oct. 31, 1936)
Don’t look now, but there is a
new monetary craze going on in some parts of the world, and it is the new so-called
‘unconventional’ monetary policy adopted by some central banks to push interest rates to ultra-low levels, and
even into negative territory. For some time now, some central banks and some governments have been pushing nominal interest rates down, so much so that a few
countries have negative short-term interest rates and, when inflation is
factored in, even more deeply negative real
interest rates. Why suddenly such an unconventional monetary policy? Their rationale is a fear that the economy could otherwise be saddled with an overvalued currency and be faced with a too heavy debt
burden, and this would hurt their economic growth.
How is this possible? How could a central bank push interest rates
to zero or to below zero, and with what consequences? A central bank does that by
offering zero or negative returns on private banks’ excess reserves or extra funds that those banks want to store at the central
bank. This is a complex matter, but essentially this occurs when private banks are awash with cash that they have
trouble lending
profitably to private borrowers. They are then forced to find alternative
ways to invest their funds, one of them is to
park those funds at the central bank, or alternatively, to buy
government bonds and other securities. The result is an increase in the prices
of those assets and a lowering of interest rates.
The question to be asked is why many banks are saddled with too much excess cash, above and beyond what is
required to meet the ordinary private demands for loans? To answer that question, we have to go back to the international
financial crisis of 2007 and later years.
This all
began with the subprime financial crisis, which started at the end of the
summer of 2007, when some
mega-banks in the United States and
in other financial centers were teetering on the edge of bankruptcy. Indeed, they had
created a new type of financial products, the so-called mortgage-and debt-backed
securities (MBS) and other asset-backed paper (ABCP), which were bundles of risky debt and were sold
as new esoteric securities.
When the housing market collapsed, these
artificially created securities also collapsed, and the banks found themselves in
financial trouble.
To prevent large banks from failing, the American central bank, i.e. the Fed, began printing new money to the extent of more than three thousand billion $ to rescue them. the Fed called its generosity “Quantitative
Easing” (QE), a fancy and
innocuous word to cover the largest expansion ever of the monetary base in the United States,
which is to a large extent made up of the Fed’s balance sheet (i.e.
the private banks' reserves held at the central bank) and of bank notes and coins
circulating in the economy.
— with the newly printed money, the
Fed bought Treasuries but also large amounts of private banks’ bad
debts. And it did it for six years from 2008
to late 2014, in three
successive rounds of money printing.
— historically speaking, it was really an
orgy of money printing. this was done, however, on the premise that the banks would leave most of their newly created bank excess reserves
deposited at the central bank. Nevertheless, the result (with so much excess liquidity in the system) was to push the prices
of bonds and securities up and to lower interest rates across the board. And, in fact, interest rates have been declining ever since. the Fed said that it was ‘reflating’ the economy. In fact, what it was doing could
be more accurately called ‘reflating’ the private banks’
balance sheets.
— During that period, the Fed’s own total balance sheet ballooned, jumping
from roughly $1,000 billion in 2008, (ordinarily, it is mostly made
up of Treasury securities and its net interest income is returned to the
Treasury), to slightly more than $4,500 billion en 2017, an increase of 350
percent.
Today, the Fed’s total balance sheet is made up of Treasuries for about 55
percent, while mortgage-and-debt backed securities that it bought from the private banks
account for about 40 percent, with gold and other assets accounting for the rest. An
important point is the fact that the Fed’s balance sheet before 2008 represented around
6 percent of annual U.S. output (GDP) but it reached 25 percent in 2014.
It has since declined somewhat to 20 percent of GDP, and the Fed would like to “normalize it “, i.e. shrink it
further to prevent future inflation and above all, to be in a position to intervene
if a new crisis were to arise.
let us now do some fast-forward thinking to today’s
economic situation.
Enter the Trump
administration in 2017 with its big
increase in the pubic debt and with its
bullying of the Powell
Fed to bring down interest rates, possibly
to zero
The last economic
recession in the United States, (dubbed the Great Recession), was the worst
since the Great
Depression of the 1930’s. It began in December 2007, and it
ended in June 2009. The economic recovery, however, has been the longest in
U.S. history, having passed the 121-month mark, and it
is already more than 10 years old.
The Trump administration’s economic policy as
been characterized by trade protectionism, an anti-immigration policy, the lowering
of taxes especially for large corporations and large banks, trillion-dollars
yearly fiscal deficits, a very loose monetary policy, and a 13 percent jump in the total U.S. public debt since Jan.
20, 2017, when President Donald Trump took office.
[N. B.: The total national
debt stood at $19.95 trillion on January 20, 2017. As of July 31, 2019, it has been galloping past $22.54 trillion.]
It could be expected that when the public debt has grown so large that there is
fear that it could not be managed if interest rates were to rise. Governments
and central banks would then be tempted to push interest rates down, in order to alleviate the burden of debt
service (essentially interest payments on government bonds). It is like
imposing a stealth tax on savers and
creditors.
It is worth pointing out that the Fed has recently done just that. Indeed, by
artificially lowering interest rates below the inflation rate and a risk
premium, it has made it possible for the U.S. Treasury to pay negative real interest rates on its public debt. This means that when the inflation rate is higher than
the nominal interest rate paid on the public debt, the U.S. government gets a free
ride at the expense of its creditors.
If interest rates were to fall to zero, for
example, or even to below zero, (as it is the case nowadays
in Japan, after its two-decade long experiment with zero interest
rates, and presently in some European countries, such as Switzerland,
Germany, Netherlands, France, Sweden, etc.), savers,
retirees, pension funds, insurance companies and lenders
in general are the big losers.
Indeed, in countries where
ten-year government bonds, for example, are generating a zero or a negative
return, this means that the principle of compound
interest has de facto been abolished for investors. Such a development may have serious
consequences for savers, retirees and pension funds.
However, when the central bank buys government bonds and issues newly
created money in exchange, this is called “debt monetization”. If this is done on a large scale, it
could eventually lead to a form of galloping
inflation, possibly even to hyperinflation.
It is also worth noting that when central
banks push interest rates to ultra low levels or to negative levels, investors have no other alternative
than to purchase assets that offer positive returns, such as shares in
companies or ownership titles of real estate. Price bubbles in the stock market and in the real estate
market can be expected to ensue. Such investments become a
refuge from the negative returns received on fixed-income financial assets.
Historically, when this has happened, such developments have ultimately ended
up in crashes and panics down the
road.
The 1920s all over again?
The economic situation of today is, to a certain
extent, reminiscent of the U.S. economy in the 1920s, leading
to the Great Depression of the 1930s. Indeed, the U.S. economy had
been growing by 2.7 percent per year between 1920 and 1929. There was overall full employment and inflation was stable.
Also, economic growth had been extended through protectionist measures, such
as the Fordney-McCumber Tariff of 1922. During the
presidential campaign of 1928, for example, republican presidential candidate
Herbert Hoover (1874-1964) proposed large tariff
increases on imports, as part of his platform. Once in power, his promise was
implemented with the passage of the infamous Smoot-Hawley tariff of 1930, which is thought to have accelerated the
global economic depression.
The economy was also stimulated through increased spending on public works and through tax
cuts in 1921,
1924, and 1925.
Moreover, President Calvin Coolidge (1872-1933) signed an anti-immigration
bill called the Immigration Act of 1924, (also called the Johnson–Reed Act), whose main purpose was to prevent
immigration to the United States of people from Asia. There was also
widespread hostility toward Catholic Americans, many of Italian origin, toward Jews, and
toward blacks.
Considering the many similarities between the
two periods, politically,
socially and economically,
a few questions beg to be asked: Is not history repeating itself? Might the
excesses of today lead also to a day of
reckoning? Might the current central bankers and politicians be
leading the
U.S. and other economies into a severe global economic downturn? Trade
protectionism, lower taxes, higher debt levels,
anti-immigration legislation, wholesale deregulation…
etc.
— It’s ‘déjà vu all over again’!
Conclusion
Artificially low interest rates may be on their way in
the United States. Fed Chairman Jerome Powell appears to have been intimidated
by Donald Trump’s bullying tactics into lowering interest rates. Therefore,
even though the U.S. economy is presently at full employment—partly a
demographic consequence of the retirement in droves of baby-boomers—it is also
saddled with very loose fiscal and monetary policies.
This is most unusual and it flies in the face of the
principles of sound economic management. Such a situation is bound to create financial
excesses and bubbles, to be corrected down the road.
In fact, the policy mix of today is a typical example
of a government going after short-run economic and political gains at the
expense of future medium- and long-run pains.
Please click
here to read COMMENTS
Please click
here to read COMMENTS
_____________________________________________________
International economist Dr. Rodrigue Tremblay is the author of
the book “The
Code for Global Ethics, Ten Humanist Principles”, of the book “The
New American Empire”, and the recent book, in
French « La
régression tranquille du Québec, 1980-2018 ».
Please visit Dr. Tremblay’s site:
Posted, Thursday, August 1, 2019, at 8:30 am
Email to a friend:
http://rodriguetremblay100.blogspot.com/
Send contact, comments or commercial reproduction requests (in English
or in French) to:
N.B.: Comments may be published on our weblog, unless you request
otherwise.
Please register to receive free
alerts on new postings of articles.
Send an email with the word "subscribe" to: carole.jean1@yahoo.ca
To unregister, send an email with the word "unsubscribe"
to: carole.jean1@yahoo.ca
To write to the author:
N.B.: This article may be
reproduced with permission or license from the author. This article is not
intended in any way as personal advice of any sort. It is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0
License.
Under the terms of the
Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/),
which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any
medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way,
and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please write to: carole.jean1@yahoo.ca.
_______________________________________________________
© 2019 by Dr. Rodrigue Tremblay